ISON COVER UP/May Not Be A Comet! But The Voyager Spacecraft!

ISON

About the discovery... It was first unstable night after ten ones of hard work. The endless clouds disturbed to look around the sky. That night Artyom and me decided to walk through early discovered asteroids with the most interesting orbits.But the sky became clean literally for half an hour till the dawn and it was decided to launch continious search platform on the border of Twins and Cancer – by chance.After the ending of the series Artyom went to have a rest. And I loaded platform in CoLiTec and remained to wait the processing completion learning earlier discovered astrometry of asteroids. When I started the programme of completing results the first thing I noticed among the third position objects was the bright one with unusual moving. The object was not identified with the MPC base. The unusual thing was rather slow movement relatively to the asteroids of the main zone in this region. At that moment I started to realize that so slow object did not belong to the asteroid zone and could be situated only far away behind Jupiter`s orbit. My heart missed a bit. Is it really a comet? There was nothing to do except disposing astrometry on the site NEOCP for acknowledgement. In the evening I asked Artyom to book the time for observation of the object on the 1.5m telescope of Maidanak observatory to be sure in the comet nature of the object. Artyom and me looked through old materials,analyzed possible orbits of a new object, by then there appeared some new astrometry points. About 4 o`clock in the morning we saw the pictures – no doubt that it was a comet, classical compact one, 9x11, similar to long-period comets. We immediately sent a message to IAU. We were waiting for results. We were afraid that the object has already been discovered. But the most interesting was that the orbit of the comet started to appear with the introduction of new points of astrometry and the analysis showed perihilion near the Sun, so the brightness of the comet in the maximum could reach the full Moon. Finally on October 24 there was a circular and it was hard to believe that perihilion of the comet was 0,01 a.e. and at the maximum brightness could reach negative dimension and such one that the comet could become quite a comet of the century! Vitali Nevski

Voyager

The twin Voyager 1 and 2 spacecraft continue exploring where nothing from Earth has flown before. In the 36th year after their 1977 launches, they each are much farther away from Earth and the Sun than Pluto. Voyager 1 and 2 are now in the "Heliosheath" - the outermost layer of the heliosphere where the solar wind is slowed by the pressure of interstellar gas. Both spacecraft are still sending scientific information about their surroundings through the Deep Space Network (DSN).

The primary mission was the exploration of Jupiter and Saturn. After making a string of discoveries there -- such as active volcanoes on Jupiter's moon Io and intricacies of Saturn's rings -- the mission was extended. Voyager 2 went on to explore Uranus and Neptune, and is still the only spacecraft to have visited those outer planets. The adventurers' current mission, the Voyager Interstellar Mission (VIM), will explore the outermost edge of the Sun's domain. And beyond.

NASA Voyager Read More >>>>>>

ISON a comet? Or Space debris? Shape is unlike a comet looks more like the Voyager spacecraft?

This blog is the first to bring attention to the doctrine of the fire of the final conflagration and its effects on all spacecraft shot into space - for you see according to St. Thomas all the works of men must burn up in the fire of the final conflagration at the end of days - all works.

According to St Thomas the fire of the final conflagration will rise up from the bowels of the earth to reach a height no greater than the level that the waters of the deluged reached in the time of Noah, and this is 15 cubits above the mountain tops.

Meaning? that all the works of men both holy and profane must be at this level or below it in order to burn up in the fire of the final conflagration.

In order for all the man-made space works to burn up in the fire of the final conflagration these profane works must below the 29,050 foot level!

And just how will all the man-made space works get here?

Most likely by the agency of the angels. Man is too lazy for the task and too stupid.

So if ISON is not a comet it maybe the Voyager spacecraft making a return trip to its place of origin, sent by the agency of the angels no less!
 

St Thomas Aquinas Versus NASA

Deep Impact Into Comet 9P/Tempel

4 July 2005

None of you understand the problems that NASA has created for generations to come. Problems caused in the name of science.

Pay attention to the doctrine of the fire of the final conflagration as written down by St. Thomas Aquinas it is found in his question 74 titled the fire of the final conflagration in nine articles.

Simply put every thing that man ever made no matter how profane or how holy, no matter how small or how large, or no matter how close or far away has to burn up in the fire of the conflagration at the end of days - everything!

If you're godless you don't believe and don't care about the doctrine of the final conflagration and I don't care for you. You're lost and will lose in the end - lost for all eternity. That's your choice and God is not gonna interfere with your free will that He gave you.

But the rest of us who cooperate with God's grace and desire to save our souls will suffer because of idiots like you and your godless scientific "experiments". We all will suffer at the hands of NASA and its godless scientists.

Here is very simple and clear reasoning - if what St Thomas said on the fire of the final conflagration is true - that all the works of men have to be cleansed by the fire of the final conflagration at the end of days and that this fire is to rise up from the bowels of the earth and reach a level no higher than 15 cubits above the mountain tops - or about 29,050 feet then that means that all the profane works of men shot into space will have to return to below this level of 15 cubits above the mountains tops in order to burn up in the fire of the final conflagration at the end of days.

Do you understand the importance of this fact? Do you understand what the consequences are for all of us if the words of St Thomas Aquinas are true?

It means everything that man ever shot into space no matter how large or how tiny is coming back!

Everything has to burn up in the fire of the final conflagration - EVERYTHING!

Unless of course the Pope gives a special dispensation to NASA to excuse their great crime - which of course the pope will not do without looking foolish, nor does the pope have the authority or power to give such a dispensation to a godless organization - we all just have to live with the coming consequences.

So pay attention to the above impact "movie" and understand that even the tiniest man-made fragments of what is left on the Comet 9P/Tempel is coming back here below that 29.050 foot level.

Go ahead and laugh now.

You can shit your pants later.

So here is what happen to a man-made object that was impacted deliberty into a coment by a bunch of godless men: On the morning of July 4th 2005 Impact occurred at 05:45 UTC (05:52 Ground UTC, +/- up to three minutes, one-way light time = 7m 26s).

Here is the schematic of the impact:

Now even if your are a believing Roman Catholic in the doctrine of the fire of the final conflagration please wonder about the feasibility of men retrieving what remains of the man-made object that exploded on impact on the surface of the comet?

Here is a picture of the deep impact crater left on the surface of the comet:

Please by all means volunteer to go to the comet and pick up the pieces and save mankind from certain destruction - cause if you don't go and retrieve all the remnant left on the surface or buried deep in the comet, I'm afraid that the only way to get the man-made fragments back here in order to burn up in the fire of the final conflagration at the end of days is to have the comet hurl itself to the earth. - call it a special delivery.

Now what does this all mean? Well for starters NASA and the rest of the space industry has reached its end - God will no longer tolerate any more man-made shit shot into space. So expect many and I mean many weird events for NASA and the space industry - disasters of sorts.

Also pay attention to the ones who have to clean up our mess. - The Angels. All the man-made shit shot into space has to come back below the 29,050 foot level and this can only be done by the agency of the Angels.

I'm thinking that the Angels are not too pleased with this task.

Who Is It That Represents NASA?

 

Question 74. The Fire Of The Final Conflagration: Article 3. Whether The Fire Whereby The World Will Be Cleansed Will Be Of The Same Species With Elemental Fire?

Venus
 

List of man-made objects left on the surface of Venus:

1. Venera 3
2. Venera 4 capsule
3. Venera 5 capsule
4. Venera 6 capsule
5. Venera 7 capsule
6. Venera 8 capsule
7. Venera 9 lander
8. Venera 10 lander
9. Pioneer Venus Bus
10. Pioneer Venus Large probe
11. Pioneer Venus Small probe - North
12. Pioneer Venus Small probe - Day
13. Pioneer Venus Small probe - Night
14. Venera 11 lander
15. Venera 12 lander
16. Venera 13 lander
17. Venera 14 lander
18. Vega 1 descent unit
19. Vega 1 balloon gondola
20. Vega 2 descent unit
21. Vega 2 balloon gondola

Question 74. The fire of the final conflagration

Article 3. Whether the fire whereby the world will be cleansed will be of the same species with elemental fire?

Objection 1. It would seem that the fire in question is not of the same species as elemental fire. For nothing consumes itself. But that fire will consume the four elements according to a gloss on 2 Peter 3:12. Therefore that fire will not be of the same species as elemental fire.  

Objection 2. Further, as power is made known by operation, so is nature made known by power. Now that fire will have a different power from the fire which is an element: because it will cleanse the universe, whereas this fire cannot do that. Therefore it will not be of the same species as this. 

Objection 3. Further, in natural bodies those that are of the same species have the same movement. But that fire will have a different movement from the fire that is an element, because it will move in all directions so as to cleanse the whole. Therefore it is not of the same species. 

On the contrary, Augustine says (De Civ. Dei xx, 16), and his words are contained in a gloss on 1 Corinthians 7:31, that "the fashion of this world will perish in the burning of worldly flames." Therefore that fire will be of the same nature as the fire which is now in the world. 

Further, just as the future cleansing is to be by fire, so was the past cleansing by water: and they are both compared to one another, 2 Peter 3:5. Now in the first cleansing the water was of the same species with elemental water. Therefore in like manner the fire of the second cleansing will be of the same species with elemental fire. 

I answer that, We meet with three opinions on this question. For some say that the element of fire which is in its own sphere will come down to cleanse the world: and they explain this descent by way of multiplication, because the fire will spread through finding combustible matter on all sides. And this will result all the more then since the virtue of the fire will be raised over all the elements. Against this, however, would seem to be not only the fact that this fire will come down, but also the statement of the saints that it will rise up; thus (2 Peter 3:10) it is declared that the fire of the judgment will rise as high as the waters of the deluge; whence it would seem to follow that this fire is situated towards the middle of the place of generation. Hence others say that this fire will be generated towards the intervening space through the focusing together of the rays of the heavenly bodies, just as we see them focused together in a burning-glass; for at that time in lieu of glasses there will be concave clouds, on which the rays will strike But this again does not seem probable: for since the effects of heavenly bodies depend on certain fixed positions and aspects, if this fire resulted from the virtue of the heavenly bodies, the time of this cleansing would be known to those who observe the movements of the stars and this is contrary to the authority of Scripture. Consequently others, following Augustine, say that "just as the deluge resulted from an outpouring of the waters of the world, so the fashion of this world will perish by a burning of worldly flames" (De Civ. Dei. xx, 16). This burning is nothing else but the assembly of all those lower and higher causes that by their nature have a kindling virtue: and this assembly will take place not in the ordinary course of things, but by the Divine power: and from all these causes thus assembled the fire that will burn the surface of this world will result. If we consider aright these opinions, we shall find that they differ as to the cause producing this fire and not as to its species. For fire, whether produced by the sun or by some lower heating cause, is of the same species as fire in its own sphere, except in so far as the former has some admixture of foreign matter. And this will of necessity be the case then, since fire cannot cleanse a thing, unless this become its matter in some way. Hence we must grant that the fire in question is simply of the same species as ours.  

Reply to Objection 1. The fire in question, although of the same species as ours, is not identically the same. Now we see that of two fires of the same species one destroys the other, namely the greater destroys the lesser, by consuming its matter. In like manner that fire will be able to destroy our fire. 

Reply to Objection 2. Just as an operation that proceeds from the virtue of a thing is an indication of that virtue, so is its virtue an indication of its essence or nature, if it proceed from the essential principles of the thing. But an operation that does not proceed from the virtue of the operator does not indicate its virtue. This appears in instruments: for the action of an instrument shows forth the virtue of the mover rather than that of the instrument, since it shows forth the virtue of the agent in so far as the latter is the first principle of the action, whereas it does not show forth the virtue of the instrument, except in so far as it is susceptive of the influence of the principal agent as moving that instrument. In like manner a virtue that does not proceed from the essential principles of a thing does not indicate the nature of that thing except in the point of susceptibility. Thus the virtue whereby hot water can heat is no indication of the nature of water except in the point of its being receptive of heat. Consequently nothing prevents water that has this virtue from being of the same species as water that has it not. In like manner it is not unreasonable that this fire, which will have the power to cleanse the surface of the world, will be of the same species as the fire to which we are used, since the heating power therein arises, not from its essential principles but from the divine power or operation: whether we say that this power is an absolute quality, such as heat in hot water, or a kind of intention as we have ascribed to instrumental virtue (Sent. iv, D, 1, qu. 1, 4) [Cf. III, 62, 4, ad 1]. The latter is more probable since that fire will not act save as the instrument of the Divine power.

Reply to Objection 3. Of its own nature fire tends only upwards; but in so far as it pursues its matter, which it requires when it is outside its own sphere, it follows the site of combustible matter. Accordingly it is not unreasonable for it to take a circular or a downward course, especially in so far as it acts as the instrument of the Divine power.



 

Question 74. The Fire Of The Final Conflagration: Article 2. Whether The Cleansing Of The World Will Be Effected By Fire?

Mercury
 

List of man-made objects left on the surface of Mercury:

1. MESSENGER

Question 74. The fire of the final conflagration

Article 2. Whether the cleansing of the world will be effected by fire?

Objection 1. It would seem that this cleansing will not be effected by fire. For since fire is a part of the world, it needs to be cleansed like the other parts. Now, the same thing should not be both cleanser and cleansed. Therefore it would seem that the cleansing will not be by fire.

Objection 2. Further, just as fire has a cleansing virtue so has water. Since then all things are not capable of being cleansed by fire, and some need to be cleansed by water — which distinction is moreover observed by the Old Law — it would seem that fire will not at any rate cleanse all things.

Objection 3. Further, this cleansing would seem to consist in purifying the parts of the world by separating them from one another. Now the separation of the parts of the world from one another at the world's beginning was effected by God's power alone, for the work of distinction was carried out by that power: wherefore Anaxagoras asserted that the separation was effected by the act of the intellect which moves all things (cf. Aristotle, Phys. viii, 9). Therefore it would seem that at the end of the world the cleansing will be done immediately by God and not by fire.

On the contrary, It is written (Psalm 49:3): "A fire shall burn before Him, and a mighty tempest shall be around Him"; and afterwards in reference to the judgment (Psalm 49:4): "He shall call heaven from above, and the earth to judge His people." Therefore it would seem that the final cleansing of the world will be by means of fire.

Further, it is written (2 Peter 3:12): "The heavens being on fire will be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with the burning heat." Therefore this cleansing will be effected by fire.

I answer that, As stated above (Article 1) this cleansing of the world will remove from it the stain contracted from sin, and the impurity resulting from mixture, and will be a disposition to the perfection of glory; and consequently in this threefold respect it will be most fitting for it to be effected by fire. First, because since fire is the most noble of the elements, its natural properties are more like the properties of glory, and this is especially clear in regard to light. Secondly, because fire, on account of the efficacy of its active virtue, is not as susceptible as the other elements to the admixture of a foreign matter. Thirdly, because the sphere of fire is far removed from our abode; nor are we so familiar with the use of fire as with that of earth, water, and air, so that it is not so liable to depreciation. Moreover, it is most efficacious in cleansing and in separating by a process of rarefaction.

Reply to Objection 1. Fire is not employed by us in its proper matter (since thus it is far removed from us), but only in a foreign matter: and in this respect it will be possible for the world to be cleansed by fire as existing in its pure state. But in so far as it has an admixture of some foreign matter it will be possible for it to be cleansed; and thus it will be cleanser and cleansed under different aspects. and this is not unreasonable.

Reply to Objection 2. The first cleansing of the world by the deluge regarded only the stain of sin. Now the sin which was most prevalent then was the sin of concupiscence, and consequently it was fitting that the cleansing should be by means of its contrary, namely water. But the second cleansing regards both the stain of sin and the impurity of mixture, and in respect of both it is more fitting for it to be effected by fire than by water. For the power of water tends to unite rather than to separate; wherefore the natural impurity of the elements could not be removed by water as by fire. Moreover, at the end of the world the prevalent sin will be that of tepidity, as though the world were already growing old, because then, according to Matthew 24:12, "the charity of many shall grow cold," and consequently the cleansing will then be fittingly effected by fire. Nor is there any thing that cannot in some way be cleansed by fire: some things, however, cannot be cleansed by fire without being destroyed themselves, such as cloths and wooden vessels, and these the Law ordered to be cleansed with water; yet all these things will be finally destroyed by fire.

Reply to Objection 3. By the work of distinction things received different forms whereby they are distinct from one another: and consequently this could only be done by Him Who is the author of nature. But by the final cleansing things will be restored to the purity wherein they were created, wherefore created nature will be able to minister to its Creator to this effect; and for this reason is a creature employed as a minister, that it is ennobled thereby.

Question 74. The Fire Of The Final Conflagration: Article 1. Whether The World Is To Be Cleansed?

List of man-made objects left on the surface of the Moon:

1. Luna 2
2. Ranger 4
3. Ranger 6
4. Ranger 7
5. Luna 5
6. Luna 7
7. Luna 8
8. Ranger 8
9. Ranger 9
10. Luna 9
11. Luna 10
12. Luna 11
13. Luna 12
14. Luna 13
15. Surveyor 1
16. Lunar Orbiter 1
17. Surveyor 2
18. Lunar Orbiter 2
19. Lunar Orbiter 3
20. Surveyor 3
21. Lunar Orbiter 4
22. Surveyor 4
23. Explorer 35 (IMP-E)
24. Lunar Orbiter 5
25. Surveyor 5
26. Surveyor 6
27. Surveyor 7
28. Luna 14
29. Apollo 10 LM (Snoopy) descent stage
30. Luna 15
31. Apollo 11 LM-5 (Eagle) descent stage
32. Apollo 11 LM ascent stage
33. Apollo 12 LM-6 (Intrepid) descent stage
34. Apollo 12 LM ascent stage
35. Luna 16 descent stage
36. Luna 17 & Lunokhod 1
37. Apollo 13 S-IVB (S-IVB-508)
38. Luna 18
39. Luna 19
40. Apollo 14 S-IVB (S-IVB-509)
41. Apollo 14 LM-8 (Antares) descent stage
42. Apollo 14 LM-8 ascent stage
43. Apollo 15 S-IVB (S-IVB-510)
44. Apollo 15 LM-10 (Falcon) descent stage
45. Apollo 15 Lunar Rover
46. Apollo 15 LM-10 ascent (Falcon) stage
47. Apollo 15 subsatellite
48. Luna 20 descent stage
49. Apollo 16 S-IVB (S-IVB-511)
50. Apollo 16 LM-11 (Orion) descent stage
51. Apollo 16 Lunar Rover
52. Apollo 16 LM-11 (Orion) ascent stage
53. Apollo 16 subsatellite
54. Apollo 17 S-IVB (S-IVB-512)
55. Apollo 17 LM-12 (Challenger) descent stage
56. Apollo 17 Lunar Rover
57. Apollo 17 LM-12 (Challenger) ascent stage
58. Luna 21 & Lunokhod 2
59. Explorer 49 (RAE-B)
60. Luna 22
61. Luna 23
62. Luna 24 descent stage
63. Hagoromo / Hiten
64. Hiten
65. Lunar Prospector
66. SMART-1
67. Moon Impact Probe (MIP) / Chandrayaan-1
68. SELENE Rstar (Okina)
69. Chang'e 1
70. Chandrayaan-1
71. SELENE (Kaguya) main orbiter
72. LCROSS Shepherding Spacecraft
73. LCROSS Centaur
74. GRAIL

Also containers of urine, flags, footprints, personal items and finally plaques. More here>>>>>>

If all of the man-made objects are to burn up in the fire of the final conflagration at the end of days as St Thomas and the Church do say.

Then please tell me how are all of the man-made objects that are left on the moon burn up in this fire of the final conflagration at the end off days?

If the fire of the final conflagration is to rise up from the bowels of the earth and reach a level no greater than the waters of the Deluge reached in the time of Noe (15 cubits above the mountain tops) to burn up all of mans works - then how does this fire burn up all the man-made works that have left the orbit of the earth?

Please answer that question.

Question 74. The fire of the final conflagration

Article 1. Whether the world is to be cleansed?

Objection 1. It would seem that there is not to be any cleansing of the world. For only that which is unclean needs cleansing. Now God's creatures are not unclean, wherefore it is written (Acts 10:15): "That which God hath cleansed, do not thou call common," i.e. unclean. Therefore the creatures of the world shall not be cleansed.

Objection 2. Further, according to Divine justice cleansing is directed to the removal of the uncleanness of sin, as instanced in the cleansing after death. But there can be no stain of sin in the elements of this world. Therefore, seemingly, they need not to be cleansed.

Objection 3. Further, a thing is said to be cleansed when any foreign matter that depreciates it is removed therefrom: for the removal of that which ennobles a thing is not called a cleansing, but rather a diminishing. Now it pertains to the perfection and nobility of the elements that something of a foreign nature is mingled with them, since the form of a mixed body is more noble than the form of a simple body. Therefore it would seem nowise fitting that the elements of this world can possibly be cleansed.

On the contrary, All renewal is effected by some kind of cleansing. But the elements will be renewed; hence it is written (Apocalypse 21:1): "I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth was gone." Therefore the elements shall be cleansed.  Further, a gloss [St. Augustine, De Civ. Dei xx, 16 on 1 Corinthians 7:31, "The fashion of this earth passeth away," says: "The beauty of this world will perish in the burning of worldly flames." Therefore the same conclusion follows.

I answer that, Since the world was, in a way, made for man's sake, it follows that, when man shall be glorified in the body, the other bodies of the world shall also be changed to a better state, so that it is rendered a more fitting place for him and more pleasant to look upon. Now in order that man obtain the glory of the body, it behooves first of all those things to be removed which are opposed to glory. There are two, namely the corruption and stain of sin--because according to 1 Corinthians 15:50, "neither shall corruption possess incorruption," and all the unclean shall be without the city of glory (Apocalypse 22:15)--and again, the elements require to be cleansed from the contrary dispositions, ere they be brought to the newness of glory, proportionately to what we have said with regard to man. Now although, properly speaking, a corporeal thing cannot be the subject of the stain of sin, nevertheless, on account of sin corporeal things contract a certain unfittingness for being appointed to spiritual purposes; and for this reason we find that places where crimes have been committed are reckoned unfit for the performance of sacred actions therein, unless they be cleansed beforehand. Accordingly that part of the world which is given to our use contracts from men's sins a certain unfitness for being glorified, wherefore in this respect it needs to be cleansed. In like manner with regard to the intervening space, on account of the contact of the elements, there are many corruptions, generations and alterations of the elements, which diminish their purity: wherefore the elements need to be cleansed from these also, so that they be fit to receive the newness of glory.

Reply to Objection 1. When it is asserted that every creature of God is clean we are to understand this as meaning that its substance contains no alloy of evil, as the Manichees maintained, saying that evil and good are two substances in some places severed from one another, in others mingled together. But it does not exclude a creature from having an admixture of a foreign nature, which in itself is also good, but is inconsistent with the perfection of that creature. Nor does this prevent evil from being accidental to a creature, although not mingled with it as part of its substance.

Reply to Objection 2. Although corporeal elements cannot be the subject of sin, nevertheless, from the sin that is committed in them they contract a certain unfitness for receiving the perfection of glory.

Reply to Objection 3. The form of a mixed body and the form of an element may be considered in two ways: either as regards the perfection of the species, and thus a mixed body is more perfect--or as regards their continual endurance; and thus the simple body is more noble, because it has not in itself the cause of corruption, unless it be corrupted by something extrinsic: whereas a mixed body has in itself the cause of its corruption, namely the composition of contraries. Wherefore a simple body, although it be corruptible in part is incorruptible as a whole, which cannot be said of a mixed body. And since incorruption belongs to the perfection of glory, it follows that the perfection of a simple is more in keeping with the perfection of glory, than the perfection of a mixed body, unless the mixed body has also in itself some principle of incorruption, as the human body has, the form of which is incorruptible. Nevertheless, although a mixed body is somewhat more noble than a simple body, a simple body that exists by itself has a more noble being than if it exist in a mixed body, because in a mixed body simple bodies are somewhat in potentiality, whereas, existing by themselves, they are in their ultimate perfection.